<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thank God the Congress is a Deliberative Body</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomgpalmer.com/2007/01/14/thank-god-the-congress-is-a-deliberative-body/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2007/01/14/thank-god-the-congress-is-a-deliberative-body/</link>
	<description>Personal website and weblog of the libertarian thinker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron G.</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2007/01/14/thank-god-the-congress-is-a-deliberative-body/comment-page-1/#comment-5875</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=1687#comment-5875</guid>
		<description>Why must fellow Star Trek fans shame me at every turn? Can I have no dignity?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why must fellow Star Trek fans shame me at every turn? Can I have no dignity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom G. Palmer</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2007/01/14/thank-god-the-congress-is-a-deliberative-body/comment-page-1/#comment-5874</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom G. Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=1687#comment-5874</guid>
		<description>Well, points well taken.  I was just struck by the term &quot;the *real* Klingons of Star Trek.&quot;  But it&#039;s true that it&#039;s more intelligent than calling critics of the president &quot;traitors,&quot; which is how low the pro-war right has fallen.

As to &quot;faux Klingons,&quot; they sound to me like the kind of problem that sweater wearers might face.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, points well taken.  I was just struck by the term &#8220;the *real* Klingons of Star Trek.&#8221;  But it&#8217;s true that it&#8217;s more intelligent than calling critics of the president &#8220;traitors,&#8221; which is how low the pro-war right has fallen.</p>
<p>As to &#8220;faux Klingons,&#8221; they sound to me like the kind of problem that sweater wearers might face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles N. Steele</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2007/01/14/thank-god-the-congress-is-a-deliberative-body/comment-page-1/#comment-5873</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles N. Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=1687#comment-5873</guid>
		<description>Damon is right; this is a great improvement over &quot;support our troops, stay the course, everyone not with us is against us and pro-terrorist.&quot;

And Tom, I think the Star Trek metaphors *are* fairly clear.  And there are likely more people who are regular consumers of Star Trek than, say, Foreign Affairs (even just among those with IQs over 130 -- take that, anon.)

But best of all in this clip is the new term &quot;faux Klingon.&quot;  This gem is a fine replacement for the tired old &quot;chickenhawk.&quot;  May this become the standard term for the Bush admin. foreign policy crew.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damon is right; this is a great improvement over &#8220;support our troops, stay the course, everyone not with us is against us and pro-terrorist.&#8221;</p>
<p>And Tom, I think the Star Trek metaphors *are* fairly clear.  And there are likely more people who are regular consumers of Star Trek than, say, Foreign Affairs (even just among those with IQs over 130 &#8212; take that, anon.)</p>
<p>But best of all in this clip is the new term &#8220;faux Klingon.&#8221;  This gem is a fine replacement for the tired old &#8220;chickenhawk.&#8221;  May this become the standard term for the Bush admin. foreign policy crew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom G. Palmer</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2007/01/14/thank-god-the-congress-is-a-deliberative-body/comment-page-1/#comment-5872</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom G. Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=1687#comment-5872</guid>
		<description>Good points, all.  I just find it a bit ... well, odd that in a speech before Congress such childish points would be made.

I also don&#039;t think that he really made anything clearer with references to &quot;Vulcans&quot; and &quot;Klingons.&quot;  Had they actually clarified anything, the references would have been welcome.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, all.  I just find it a bit &#8230; well, odd that in a speech before Congress such childish points would be made.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t think that he really made anything clearer with references to &#8220;Vulcans&#8221; and &#8220;Klingons.&#8221;  Had they actually clarified anything, the references would have been welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon Chetson</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2007/01/14/thank-god-the-congress-is-a-deliberative-body/comment-page-1/#comment-5871</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon Chetson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=1687#comment-5871</guid>
		<description>Actually, to the extent that he was making arguments that haven&#039;t been made often in the past 6 years, he was raising the level of debate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, to the extent that he was making arguments that haven&#8217;t been made often in the past 6 years, he was raising the level of debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2007/01/14/thank-god-the-congress-is-a-deliberative-body/comment-page-1/#comment-5870</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=1687#comment-5870</guid>
		<description>Honestly though,  this is a congressional speech that would actually grab the attention of an American audience that could give a rats ass about what happens in our gov&#039;t. Or understands half of what is being discussed.  People with a IQ of 130 and above aren&#039;t the only ones who vote.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly though,  this is a congressional speech that would actually grab the attention of an American audience that could give a rats ass about what happens in our gov&#8217;t. Or understands half of what is being discussed.  People with a IQ of 130 and above aren&#8217;t the only ones who vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy H.</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2007/01/14/thank-god-the-congress-is-a-deliberative-body/comment-page-1/#comment-5869</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=1687#comment-5869</guid>
		<description>&quot;And like the real idiots of Congress...&quot;  What a goof!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And like the real idiots of Congress&#8230;&#8221;  What a goof!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

