<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vienna</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomgpalmer.com/2009/10/14/vienna/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2009/10/14/vienna/</link>
	<description>Personal website and weblog of the libertarian thinker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:00:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eli Feigenbaum</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2009/10/14/vienna/comment-page-1/#comment-14005</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Feigenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=4095#comment-14005</guid>
		<description>You have willfully ignored the relevant point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have willfully ignored the relevant point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles N. Steele</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2009/10/14/vienna/comment-page-1/#comment-13980</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles N. Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=4095#comment-13980</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t trust people unless you&#039;re on a first name basis with them?  Very odd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t trust people unless you&#8217;re on a first name basis with them?  Very odd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli Feigenbaum</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2009/10/14/vienna/comment-page-1/#comment-13971</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Feigenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=4095#comment-13971</guid>
		<description>You are certainly welcome to your own policies on this, Mr. Steele, but if you do not know your medical doctor well enough -- or trust him well enough -- to speak to him on a first name basis, then I wonder: Why do you see him at all? It is a formality that we would not dare countenance in other matters.

No doubt, others will think I making too much of this -- even by simply mentioning it. But if I were looking after my own best interest -- as understood and advanced by others on this site -- I would defend the practice. Instead, I am questioning it because I think it does no good -- and, in fact, may do significant harm. We should wish to reduce cases where people feel -- when there is no good reason -- that there is substantial aymmetric information simply as a matter of titles. In my opinion, this prevents people from asking good and probing questions. At the same time, I acknowlede that such asymmetric arrangements do, in fact, exist and no matter of egalitarian &quot;leveling&quot; will change that.

You may find this position &quot;wrong&quot; or &quot;unreasonable&quot; or whatever else you wish to label it -- but that, I believe, is an extremely difficult proposition to defend if you give it careful thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are certainly welcome to your own policies on this, Mr. Steele, but if you do not know your medical doctor well enough &#8212; or trust him well enough &#8212; to speak to him on a first name basis, then I wonder: Why do you see him at all? It is a formality that we would not dare countenance in other matters.</p>
<p>No doubt, others will think I making too much of this &#8212; even by simply mentioning it. But if I were looking after my own best interest &#8212; as understood and advanced by others on this site &#8212; I would defend the practice. Instead, I am questioning it because I think it does no good &#8212; and, in fact, may do significant harm. We should wish to reduce cases where people feel &#8212; when there is no good reason &#8212; that there is substantial aymmetric information simply as a matter of titles. In my opinion, this prevents people from asking good and probing questions. At the same time, I acknowlede that such asymmetric arrangements do, in fact, exist and no matter of egalitarian &#8220;leveling&#8221; will change that.</p>
<p>You may find this position &#8220;wrong&#8221; or &#8220;unreasonable&#8221; or whatever else you wish to label it &#8212; but that, I believe, is an extremely difficult proposition to defend if you give it careful thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles N. Steele</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2009/10/14/vienna/comment-page-1/#comment-13968</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles N. Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=4095#comment-13968</guid>
		<description>Anyone with a doctoral degree is a doctor.  What is so difficult to understand about this, Eli?  The fact that in the United States &quot;doctor&quot; became short in popular language for &quot;Doctor of Medicine&quot; hardly changes this.

Now as for what to call  M.D.&#039;s, you&#039;re welcome to your own policies in these matters, but I&#039;ve always called M.D.&#039;s &quot;Dr. Such and such&quot; because of the extremely high regard I have for people who have taken such efforts to learn to help their fellow humans.  I find the practice of calling M.D.&#039;s by their first names almost offensive.  They are *not* &quot;just plain folks.&quot;  I&#039;d not want to trust my health and life to &quot;just plain other folks.&quot;  The egalitarianization of society that this represents is &quot;just plain wrong.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone with a doctoral degree is a doctor.  What is so difficult to understand about this, Eli?  The fact that in the United States &#8220;doctor&#8221; became short in popular language for &#8220;Doctor of Medicine&#8221; hardly changes this.</p>
<p>Now as for what to call  M.D.&#8217;s, you&#8217;re welcome to your own policies in these matters, but I&#8217;ve always called M.D.&#8217;s &#8220;Dr. Such and such&#8221; because of the extremely high regard I have for people who have taken such efforts to learn to help their fellow humans.  I find the practice of calling M.D.&#8217;s by their first names almost offensive.  They are *not* &#8220;just plain folks.&#8221;  I&#8217;d not want to trust my health and life to &#8220;just plain other folks.&#8221;  The egalitarianization of society that this represents is &#8220;just plain wrong.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli Feigenbaum</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2009/10/14/vienna/comment-page-1/#comment-13966</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Feigenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=4095#comment-13966</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t call my medical doctors &quot;Dr.&quot; either -- they are Seth and Judith to me -- and that is at should be, as well. They should treat their colleagues -- and perhaps more importantly, their patients -- as just plain other folks, people who deserve to be told what is wrong (and what is not wrong) with them.  So my initial point was ill-advised and I regret making it. Still, and it may be a bias I have (though I doubt it from decades of experience) but to call someone who received a PhD a &quot;Doctor&quot; is simply grotesque, no matter where you. 

Please do not take this comment as condescending, because I honestly do not mean it that way: But if you had a faculty position, or something approaching it, I think you would better understand my point.

Again, I do not mean that in a derogatory way -- I greatly admire what you are doing on behalf of liberalism. And I have on many occasions both here and abroad had to welcome and entertain foreign officeholders, but none, not even from continental Europe, would I embarrass by calling or introducing him as &quot;Dr.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t call my medical doctors &#8220;Dr.&#8221; either &#8212; they are Seth and Judith to me &#8212; and that is at should be, as well. They should treat their colleagues &#8212; and perhaps more importantly, their patients &#8212; as just plain other folks, people who deserve to be told what is wrong (and what is not wrong) with them.  So my initial point was ill-advised and I regret making it. Still, and it may be a bias I have (though I doubt it from decades of experience) but to call someone who received a PhD a &#8220;Doctor&#8221; is simply grotesque, no matter where you. </p>
<p>Please do not take this comment as condescending, because I honestly do not mean it that way: But if you had a faculty position, or something approaching it, I think you would better understand my point.</p>
<p>Again, I do not mean that in a derogatory way &#8212; I greatly admire what you are doing on behalf of liberalism. And I have on many occasions both here and abroad had to welcome and entertain foreign officeholders, but none, not even from continental Europe, would I embarrass by calling or introducing him as &#8220;Dr.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom G. Palmer</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2009/10/14/vienna/comment-page-1/#comment-13960</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom G. Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=4095#comment-13960</guid>
		<description>This is Austria, not California.  Here people are likely to feel insulted if you do not use the appropriate term.  There are differences among cultures and, like them or not, I generally think that there should be a presumption that one respect them, unless there is a clear reason not to.  For you, a &quot;Dr.&quot; is someone with a medical degree.  Ok, but why insist on that?  What makes a &quot;medical doctor&quot; special, in a way that a historian, an engineer, a biologist, a chemist, or a lawyer, each of whom is highly trained and knowledgeable, is not? 

When I&#039;m in China, I make an effort to comport myself in a way that is respectful of Chinese expectations.  The same goes for Austria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is Austria, not California.  Here people are likely to feel insulted if you do not use the appropriate term.  There are differences among cultures and, like them or not, I generally think that there should be a presumption that one respect them, unless there is a clear reason not to.  For you, a &#8220;Dr.&#8221; is someone with a medical degree.  Ok, but why insist on that?  What makes a &#8220;medical doctor&#8221; special, in a way that a historian, an engineer, a biologist, a chemist, or a lawyer, each of whom is highly trained and knowledgeable, is not? </p>
<p>When I&#8217;m in China, I make an effort to comport myself in a way that is respectful of Chinese expectations.  The same goes for Austria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli Feigenbaum</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2009/10/14/vienna/comment-page-1/#comment-13959</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Feigenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=4095#comment-13959</guid>
		<description>Just a quick note: A &quot;Dr.&quot; is someone with a medical degree. There is something unseemly -- and more than a little embarrassing -- about PhDs calling themselves &quot;doctors.&quot; Or for others to do the same. Thank goodness that the practice seems to be on the decline. If a colleague in my department -- or, even a student -- were to go up to me or someone else and call him &quot;Dr.&quot; that colleague would be thought more than a bit odd and the student would be politely corrected and asked to refer to the person by his first name. Using the term is not a sign of respect -- it&#039;s a way of establishing an artificial wall between people who are after the same goal: pursuing truth. And, sadly, sometimes I think it is a way to prop up one&#039;s fragile ego.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick note: A &#8220;Dr.&#8221; is someone with a medical degree. There is something unseemly &#8212; and more than a little embarrassing &#8212; about PhDs calling themselves &#8220;doctors.&#8221; Or for others to do the same. Thank goodness that the practice seems to be on the decline. If a colleague in my department &#8212; or, even a student &#8212; were to go up to me or someone else and call him &#8220;Dr.&#8221; that colleague would be thought more than a bit odd and the student would be politely corrected and asked to refer to the person by his first name. Using the term is not a sign of respect &#8212; it&#8217;s a way of establishing an artificial wall between people who are after the same goal: pursuing truth. And, sadly, sometimes I think it is a way to prop up one&#8217;s fragile ego.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles N. Steele</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2009/10/14/vienna/comment-page-1/#comment-13884</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles N. Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=4095#comment-13884</guid>
		<description>re Photo 1: that must be some great coffee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re Photo 1: that must be some great coffee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
