<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Amusing Example of &#8220;If you say it often enough, someone might believe it.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomgpalmer.com/2010/01/05/an-amusing-example-of-if-you-say-it-often-enough-someone-might-believe-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2010/01/05/an-amusing-example-of-if-you-say-it-often-enough-someone-might-believe-it/</link>
	<description>Personal website and weblog of the libertarian thinker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick T. Long</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2010/01/05/an-amusing-example-of-if-you-say-it-often-enough-someone-might-believe-it/comment-page-1/#comment-18346</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick T. Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=4578#comment-18346</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s part of common usage only in strictly delimited contexts.  People pretty much ONLY use it that way when they&#039;re criticising religion (or criticising something AS a religion).  But religions themselves don&#039;t use it that way, and critics of religion don&#039;t use it that way in other contexts.  (&quot;I have faith in Bob&#039;s honesty&quot; doesn&#039;t mean &quot;I have a groundless belief in Bob&#039;s honesty.&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s part of common usage only in strictly delimited contexts.  People pretty much ONLY use it that way when they&#8217;re criticising religion (or criticising something AS a religion).  But religions themselves don&#8217;t use it that way, and critics of religion don&#8217;t use it that way in other contexts.  (&#8220;I have faith in Bob&#8217;s honesty&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;I have a groundless belief in Bob&#8217;s honesty.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom G. Palmer</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2010/01/05/an-amusing-example-of-if-you-say-it-often-enough-someone-might-believe-it/comment-page-1/#comment-18187</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom G. Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=4578#comment-18187</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Rod. I&#039;ll print this out and read it.  (I&#039;m open minded, but believing something without any evidence for it is a part of the common usage of the term &quot;faith.&quot;  But I&#039;ll print this out and read it at on the exercise bike tonight.)

All the best,
Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Rod. I&#8217;ll print this out and read it.  (I&#8217;m open minded, but believing something without any evidence for it is a part of the common usage of the term &#8220;faith.&#8221;  But I&#8217;ll print this out and read it at on the exercise bike tonight.)</p>
<p>All the best,<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick T. Long</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2010/01/05/an-amusing-example-of-if-you-say-it-often-enough-someone-might-believe-it/comment-page-1/#comment-18171</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick T. Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=4578#comment-18171</guid>
		<description>Tom, in one of the comments there it sounds like you&#039;re saying that not being based on evidence is part of the &lt;em&gt;definition&lt;/em&gt; of faith.  I don&#039;t think this is part of the meaning of the term, either in theology or in ordinary language.  I&#039;ve talked about this here:
  
http://aaeblog.com/2008/01/14/defensor-fidei</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, in one of the comments there it sounds like you&#8217;re saying that not being based on evidence is part of the <em>definition</em> of faith.  I don&#8217;t think this is part of the meaning of the term, either in theology or in ordinary language.  I&#8217;ve talked about this here:</p>
<p><a href="http://aaeblog.com/2008/01/14/defensor-fidei" rel="nofollow">http://aaeblog.com/2008/01/14/defensor-fidei</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

