<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cato University 2010:  Be There&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomgpalmer.com/2010/03/09/cato-university-2010-be-there/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2010/03/09/cato-university-2010-be-there/</link>
	<description>Personal website and weblog of the libertarian thinker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:34:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Palmer</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2010/03/09/cato-university-2010-be-there/comment-page-1/#comment-20940</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=5230#comment-20940</guid>
		<description>Octopi! ;)

But note: 
The plural form of octopus is octopuses (or occasionally octopodes). Although it is often supposed that octopi is the &#039;correct&#039; plural of octopus, and it has been in use for longer than the usual Anglicized plural octopuses, it in fact originates as an error. Octopus is not a simple Latin word of the second declension, but a Latinized form of the Greek word oktopous, and its &#039;correct&#039; plural would logically be octopodes. 
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_plural_of_octopus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Octopi! <img src='http://tomgpalmer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But note:<br />
The plural form of octopus is octopuses (or occasionally octopodes). Although it is often supposed that octopi is the &#8216;correct&#8217; plural of octopus, and it has been in use for longer than the usual Anglicized plural octopuses, it in fact originates as an error. Octopus is not a simple Latin word of the second declension, but a Latinized form of the Greek word oktopous, and its &#8216;correct&#8217; plural would logically be octopodes.<br />
<a href="http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_plural_of_octopus" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_plural_of_octopus</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon P</title>
		<link>http://tomgpalmer.com/2010/03/09/cato-university-2010-be-there/comment-page-1/#comment-20938</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomgpalmer.com/?p=5230#comment-20938</guid>
		<description>Great design of the Octopus! Octopuses don&#039;t have a skeleton, hence no spine....just sayin&#039;. ha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great design of the Octopus! Octopuses don&#8217;t have a skeleton, hence no spine&#8230;.just sayin&#8217;. ha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

