On the plane back from Germany, I finished a book I had started some time ago and then set aside, Bruce Bawer‘s While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam Is Destroying the West from Within. It’s a pretty upsetting book, mainly because of quote after quote after quote from European intellectuals and politicians whose policy toward the assault on their lives and freedoms by radical Islamists is preemptive surrender.
As I read the book, I got an unexpected sample of the preemptive surrender mentality from the couple next to me. They were two of those typically middle American travelers who insist on introducing themselves to you and starting up a conversation. Such people usually don’t annoy me and sometimes the conversation even turns out to be worthwhile. Not in this case. When they noticed that I had several books on Islamic and Middle Eastern thought and history (I’m not counting Bawer’s book), they asked me why I was reading them. I told them a little about my colleagues and our work in Arabic to promote individual rights, religious freedom, freedom of trade, and other classical liberal principles in the Middle East. I gave the example of what we had published on the Danish cartoon controversy and how my friend Zainab al-Suwaij explained the idea and practice of freedom of the press. “Well,” commented the woman, “one lesson we all have to learn from that event is to be more sensitive.” I was astonished. People who live in free societies have to be more “sensitive” about what may or may not be printed, because others are offended and will try to kill them! I told her that she had it exactly backward, that it was the offended who had to learn to be less sensitive and not to use violence against those who express opinions they don’t like. Her husband piped in that “we don’t really have a free press, anyway,” an inane remark that was followed by an inane story of a trip he’d taken as a teenager through Communist-ruled Eastern Europe, which he had seen wasn’t so bad. The western press, after all, had printed nothing but propaganda with all those stories about “oppression” under communism. I asked if he had been taken on his government-supervised tour to visit any of the slave labor camps in the Gulag, or to visit the deportees in remote parts of Siberia or Kazakhstan, or the people whose parents were taken out and shot under Stalin, or those who had been shot trying to get over the Wall, or the professors of literature or mathematics who were imprisoned for dangerous views and then reassigned to work as boiler-room operators.
I would not have been surprised to hear such stupidity from a couple of leftist college professors, but usually middle Americans are, if not all that bookishly interesting, at least wiser than the professional intellectuals who are ashamed to live in free societies. Unfortunately, Michael Mooreism has seeped through to some of middle America, as well. I was astonished to find the preemptive surrender mentality sitting on the plane next to me, flying back to the U.S.
Noam Chomsky is very popular with the kiddies, these days. Hell, even Pearl Jam is a fan of Noam.
According to Noam, Hamas is better than the evil US and Isreal:
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=20819_Chomsky-_Hamas_is_Better_Than_the_US_or_Israel&only
Al Gore, Michale Moore & Noam Chomsky — these are the values of Middle America!!!
Tom,
I had just finished reading another, more encouraging note at http://wahdah.blogspot.com/2006/04/profiles-in-courage.html right after I read your post.
Who knows who your airline couple will meet next? I’ve come across many like them in the process of mediating domestic disputes over the years. They accept many values, some of which are actually good, some bad, as you discovered. But they are not involved in the process of inquiry, only receiving ideas from their peers and their family, like so many do. The libertarian ideals of classical liberalism are beyond their current imaginings. Perhaps they will discover them, but don’t expect miracles at this stage in their lives. They have too much invested in their current beliefs to change readily.
Education always comes at
Best to you.
Just Ken
kgregglv@cox.net
http://classicalliberalism.blogspot.com/
Thanks for sharing this experience. I’ve had similar encounters, but I usually give up early. At least you challenged them. I’ve found myself too flabbergasted to respond to ignorant remarks like that.
I’m generally optimistic about humanity’s future, but it’s after meeting people like that I get my doubts.
Good post Tom, but I have to question how independent the press is.
“Most Americans are too stupid to be free.” Neal Boortz.
This may be an over generalization, but in my experiences it seems to be true. Unfortunately, many Americans use their affluence and leisure to pursue vain activities of pleasure. This is not a crime, but, it would be of benefit to use half our leisure time seeking true knowledge.
Liberty and the blessings from it was what attracted me to libertarianism. I’ve discovered early on that it takes due diligence in reading and studying of libertarian literature to maintain a high level of libertarian thinking. This has been a great pleasure for me. Its a shame that many Americans, like the people on plane with Tom, are okay with being clueless and uninformed.
Those people were not on a plane with Tom. There were on a flight with him, though.
You’re depressing me Tom. Living in NYC all my 50 years I expect to meet people with that attitude. But I had wanted to imagine that Middle America didn’t fall for all the PC propaganda.